In preparation for the submission of my pre-proposal, I have
been researching the existing public spheres for education reform in the United
States, specifically online. I expected to find areas that called for action only, as in the
instrumental view of social media use, which Shirky talked about in the article
from my last blog post. Instead, I found spaces that attempt to disseminate
information, encourage discourse, and call for community action, which seems to
fit more closely with the environmental view of social media use.
Each space that I encountered seemed to be speaking to
different publics, and about different aspects of education reform. The Center
for Education Reform (http://www.edreform.com/)
for example, claims to make a difference by; creating connections, fact-checking,
and mobilizing grassroots campaigns. While their issues cover areas that could
potentially interest a broad audience, their target audience seems to be mostly
parents, teachers, and high-level administrators/ decision makers. References to
stakeholders on various sections of their website mention family and teachers
as the most important groups involved in the issues of education reform. Perhaps
this targeted audience is a result of the Center’s strong belief in testing and
assessment as a means of demonstrating successful instruction. While this
website has some great information, the information is very focused on their “shared”
perspective. This led me to question where other groups go to find a reform
group with different priorities.
For the student activists, I found Students for Education
Reform (SFER) (http://www.studentsforedreform.org/),
which was founded by students for students. This site has a decidedly different
focus. They claim to be interested in a just social order that enables
equitable education for all. While education standards are included on their
list of “What we stand for,” this issue appears 4th on the list
after high expectation regardless of background, quality school choices and
great teachers and leaders. This movement is housed in over 140 campuses across
that nation in chapters that attract current students and recent graduates to
share their stories about their experiences with public education. The great
thing about the SFER webpage is that their strategy and mission are clearly
laid out and easily accessible. Information is easy to find and in some cases, presented
graphically, in a way that allows information to be found without reading lengthy
manifestos or policy manuals. By presenting the information in this way, the
webpage developers have understood that the current generation (current/recent
students) respond to information that is easily accessible.
As I move forward I want to locate other sites of activism
to see how they are reaching out to their publics. In particular I will be
looking at any references to a public, how their information is presented,
which issues are emphasized, and the type of action they are promoting. My
first action items is to look at teacher and administrator unions to uncover
how they compare to these other spaces of the education reform environment.
It seems that there is a little overlap between your interests and mine. I may have to mooch off some of your research. ;)
ReplyDeleteAlthough it is not surprising that these different sources address their publics in different ways, it is interesting to see exactly how those difference have manifested in the content and construction of their sites. After last week's readings, I wonder if there seems to be a different level of participation/following for the different groups because the student group (SFER) more closely resembles the "social media as revolution" type of argument we have been reading about. Are students jumping on board for this or does their movement seem more informational than revolutionary?
- Sheri